Posts Tagged ‘Ars Technica’

New Linux patch to circumvent Microsoft’s FAT patents

Posted 02 Jul 2009 — by Arun
Category Linux

If you had followed the legal tussle between TomTom and Microsoft, you would know it was about the implementation of FAT filesystem in TomTom’s GPSes. According to Ars Technica, Andrew Tridgell, one of the lead developers behind the Samba project, published a patch last week that will alter the behavior of the Linux FAT implementation. The specific patents in question describe techniques for implementing a “common name space for long and short filenames.” It is a hack for preserving backwards compatibility with the filename munging scheme that was used in MS-DOS when filenames could not exceed 11 characters and were displayed in the so-called “8.3″ format.

The patch will alter the behavior of the Linux FAT implementation so that it will not generate both short and long filenames. In situations where the total filename fits within the 11-character limit, the filesystem will generate only a short name. When the filename exceeds that length, it will only generate a long name and will populate the short name value with 11 invalid characters so that it is ignored by the operating system.

This is Tridgell’s second patch to address the patent issue. His first, which was published in May, completely disabled the creation of files with long filenames. The new patch is a more practical approach and one that will have less detrimental impact on end users. The Linux kernel community was not particularly happy with the first approach, but the new patch is said to have a better chance of being accepted in the mainline kernel.

The Linux Foundation arranged for the patch to undergo extensive review by patent lawyers. They are confident that the patch will effectively evade the common namespace method described by Microsoft’s patents. It will also function properly in virtually all cases. The only situation in which it will be problematic is when the data on the filesystem is accessed from old versions of DOS or Windows that still require the 8.3 filenames. Tridgell believes that such a scenario is rare enough that it will not impact a significant number of users. Those who require compatibility with those older versions of DOS or Windows can use the Linux “msdos” filesystem, which enforces 8.3 names and doesn’t use Microsoft’s patented dual-naming convention.

Source: Ars Technica.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

OpenDocument drops support for ODF, now supports CDF

Posted 02 Nov 2007 — by Arun
Category News

According to Ars Technica, OpenDocument Foundation has decided to end its support for OASIS’s OpenDocument Format (ODF) and instead support W3C’s Compound Document Format (CDF), which is currently described in the Web Integration Compound Document Core 1.0 draft.

The CDF is intended to support integrated use of multiple markup languages and seems primarily based on on the use of XHTML and SVG. According to the OpenDocument Foundation, the CDF offers several advantages over ODF, including less risk of intellectual property encumberment, greater flexibility, and broader use of existing standards.

Sun holds critical patents relating to the OpenDocument format and has retained the right to countersue for infringement if sued over related technologies. The OpenDocument Foundation feels that this unduly advantages Sun and offers ODF nothing but excessive intellectual property burdens. OOXML suffers from the same problem, according to the foundation, which has accused Microsoft of misrepresenting the intellectual property implications of OOXML adoption.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,